Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 F.2d 111 - Weaver v. Gardner

Weaver v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

394 F.2d 111 · 1968

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
October 1971
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Weaver v. Gardner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Many witnesses testified on behalf of Ulis Weaver and in support of his contention that he was born in 1890. * * * The Secretary, however, relied in large part upon documentary evidence in support of his contrary finding that Ulis Weaver was born in 1905. Although the question of Ulis Weaver’s age is not entirely free of doubt, the Secretary’s findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, and are therefore conclusive.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.