Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

394 F.2d 180

Docket No. 22054.

Hicks v. Wilson

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

April 15, 1968.

Rehearing Denied June 21, 1968.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-04-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1968

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1968-04-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

John Henry Hicks, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Derald E. Granberg, Louise H. Renne, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and CRARY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

This appeal is taken from order of the District Court for the Northern District of California dismissing appellant's petition for writ of habeas corpus. We find no merit in appellant's contention that he had inadequate representation by counsel. Indeed, his appellate counsel succeeded in reversing an improperly imposed sentence.

¶2

Judgment affirmed.

/394/f2d/180 · .json · Public domain