Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 F.2d 281 - Clay v. United States

Clay v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

394 F.2d 281 · 1968

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
February 1989
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 1989

14 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

110196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Brinegar v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · Draper v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We are mindful that in determining the validity of an arrest we are dealing with the probability, and not the certainty, that an offense has been or is being committed. While probable cause implies that the information which has come either directly or indirectly to the arresting officers’ knowledge must rise above the mere suspicion of criminal activity, it at the same time need not be tantamount to that quantum of proof which would sustain a conviction of guilt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.