Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

394 F.2d 6

Docket No. 17885.

Etherton v. United States

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1968.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-04-16

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1973

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Etherton v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1968-04-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*7W. E. Badgett, Knoxville, Tenn., for appellants.

¶2Frank X. Grossi, Jr., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, David O. Walter, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief; John H. Reddy, U. S. Atty., John H. Cary, Asst. U. S. Atty., Knoxville, Tenn., of counsel, for appellee.

¶3Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and McCREE, Circuit Judges.

¶4ORDER

¶5This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court, 278 F.Supp. 568, that appellants, owners of a number of motels, were liable for certain social security, unemployment and withholding taxes because the operators of the motels were employees of the owners and not independent contractors, and that the owners were therefore not entitled to the refund sought by them. Upon consideration, we do not find that the findings of fact of the District Court are clearly erroneous, and it is ordered that the judgment be, and hereby is, affirmed.

/394/f2d/6 · .json · Public domain