Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

394 F.2d 7

Docket Docket 32305.

Wolfson v. Palmieri

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued May 1, 1968.

Decided May 2, 1968.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-05-02

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1978

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Bryan

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1968-05-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

William O. Bittman, Austin S. Mittler, Hogan & Hartson, Edgar H. Brenner, Arnold & Porter, Washington, D. C., Chester Bedell, Bedell, Bedell, Dittmar & Smith, Jacksonville, Fla., for defendants-appellants, Wolfson and Gerbert.

Paul R. Grand, Asst. U. S. Atty., Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for appellee, United States.

Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition having been filed herein by counsel for the petitioners and argument having been had thereon,

Upon consideration thereof, it is

¶2

Ordered that said petition be and it hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

¶3

In United States v. Simon, 2 Cir., 393 F.2d 90, cited as a precedent for the relief sought here, the court had the power to issue a writ of mandamus (although it never became necessary for the court to do so because the district judge complied with the court's suggestion that he voluntarily recuse himself), since that application was accompanied by an affidavit of bias and prejudice. No such affidavit accompanied the instant application. Accordingly we hold that we do not have jurisdiction to entertain the application.

/394/f2d/7 · .json · Public domain