Fulwood v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis
394 F.2d 939 · 1967
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently June 1996 · most notably 3 Cal. 3d 16 - In Re William M. (1970), Doe v. State (1971)
16 federal appellate · 28 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (Bail Reform Act of 1984)
Relies on Fay v. Noia · Kent v. United States · Darr v. Burford · Stack v. Boyle · Royall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[G]iven the historic concern of the courts with the welfare of minors, ... any court is properly reluctant to penalize a juvenile for procedural defaults, especially those of his attorney.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to make an appropriate inquiry to insure that the statutory criteria, as applied to that juvenile, are being met.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re WL
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.