Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 F.3d 1 - Silva v. Ashcroft

Silva v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

394 F.3d 1 · 2005

Citation profile

120
cited by 120 later decisions
July 2024
most recently cited

80 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 120 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Bocova v. Gonzales (2005), Nikijuluw v. Gonzales (2005)

80 federal appellate · 2 district ·

910200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 6 U.S.C. § 291 · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stevic · Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre · Fatin v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 120 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A]ction by non-governmental actors can undergird a claim of persecution only if there is some showing that the alleged persecutors are in league with the government or are not controllable by the government.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.