Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 F.3d 399 - Blackmon v. Booker

Blackmon v. Booker’s Empirical Analysis

394 F.3d 399 · 2004

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
April 2021
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2021

7 federal appellate ·

70200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Maples v. Stegall · Petrucelli v. Coombe · Jerry McMeans v. Anthony J. Brigano, Warden,respondent-Appellee · Franklin v. Rose · Newton v. Million

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) reliance upon federal cases employing constitutional analysis; (2) reliance upon state cases employing federal constitutional analysis; (3) phrasing the claim in terms of constitutional law or in terms sufficiently particular to allege a denial of a specific constitutional right; or (4) alleging facts well within the mainstream of constitutional law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A petitioner need not cite “chapter and verse” of constitutional law, Franklin v. Rose, 811 F.2d 322, 326 (6th Cir.1987), but “[g]eneral allegations of the denial of rights to a ‘fair trial’ and ‘due process’ do not ‘fairly present claims’ that specific constitutional rights were violated.” McMeans [v. Brigano, 228 F.3d 674, 681 (6th Cir.2000) ] (citing Petrucelli v. Coombe, 735 F.2d 684, 688-89 (2nd Cir. 1984)).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.