Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 F.3d 469 - Board v. Farnham

Board v. Farnham’s Empirical Analysis

394 F.3d 469 · 2005

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Sanford ex rel. Estate of Sanford v. Stiles (2006), Williams v. Rodriguez (2007)

31 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

450200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Estelle v. Gamble · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Farmer v. Brennan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[C]onduct is deliberately indifferent when the official has acted in an intentional or criminally reckless manner, i.e., the defendant must have known that the plaintiff was at serious risk of being harmed and decided not to do anything to prevent that harm from occurring even though he could have easily done so. ' ■”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.