Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 F.3d 82 - Bizzarro v. Miranda

Bizzarro v. Miranda’s Empirical Analysis

394 F.3d 82 · 2005

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
March 2024
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 18 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Clubside, Inc. v. Valentin (2006), Cordi-Allen v. Conlon (2007)

15 federal appellate · 18 district ·

590200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Village of Willowbrook v. Olech · Zahra v. Town of Southold · Harlen Associates v. The Incorporated Village of Mineola and Board of Trustees for the Incorporated Village of Mineola · Giordano v. City of New York · Salim I/o v. Proulx

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[djrawing from the ... standards articulated in Moss and Berrios as well as from the immunity inquiry outlined in Wood, we believe that liability in the instant type of equal protection case should depend on proof that (1) the person, compared with others similarly situated, was selectively treated; and (2) that such selective treatment was based on impermissible considerations such as race, religion, intent to inhibit or punish the exercise of constitutional rights, or malicious or bad faith intent to injure a person.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Plaintiff's class-of-one [selective-prosecution] claim fails because defendants’ pursuit of violations of the wetlands law was rationally related to the legitimate goals of the town wetlands department. ‘An Olech-type [class-of-one] equal protection claim focuses on whether the official’s conduct was rationally related to the accomplishment of the work of [his] agency.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “23 In relying on evidence of the defendants' angry responses to the plaintiffs' recalcitrance, however, plaintiffs tend to undercut rather than to bolster their theory. The branch of equal protection law that protects individuals from unequal treatment motivated by”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.