Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 F.3d 925 - United States v. Moore

United States v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

394 F.3d 925 · 2005

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
July 2023
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2023

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

130200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Terry v. Ohio · Ornelas v. United States · United States v. Cortez · Illinois v. Wardlow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`general practice is to remand the claim for an evidentiary hearing.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “made errors so serious that [she] was not functioning as the `counsel' guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.