Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 FSUPP 918 - Buckley v. Littell

Buckley v. Littell’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
March 1991
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 1991

6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

70197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · St. Amant v. Thompson · Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts · Garrison v. State of Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “, id. at 895, was the court's treatment of the statement: 41 Like Westbrook Pegler, who lied day after day in his column about Quentin Reynolds and goaded him into a lawsuit, Buckley could be taken to court by any one of several people who had enough money to hire competent legal counsel and nothing else to do. 42 This was considered to be a defamatory assertion of fact namely, that Buckley had made false and libelous statements. After repeating the contrast drawn in Gertz between expressions of”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “accuses Buckley of deliberately acting as a deceiver in the purveying of fascist material.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “by writing a book, God and Man at Yale, upon graduating from his alma mater. The book has been soundly exposed and condemned by professors and overseers and loyal alumni for falsely twisting facts and for sheer malice. The National Review and his syndicated newspaper column,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.