Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 Mass. 10 - Commonwealth v. Dunne

Commonwealth v. Dunne’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

2 district · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Commonwealth v. Olszewski (1993), Commonwealth v. Chavis (1993)

2 district · 31 state decisions

1101985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · United States v. Cronic · Ungar v. Sarafite · Avery v. State of Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"First, the document must be the type of record contemplated by G.L.c. 233, § 79. Second, the information must be germane to the patient's treatment or medical history. Third, the information must be recorded from the personal knowledge of the entrant or from a compilation of the personal knowledge of those who are under a medical obligation to transmit such information. Fourth, voluntary statements of third persons appearing in the record are not admissible unless they are offered for reasons other than to prove the truth of the matter contained therein or, if offered for their truth, come within another exception to the hearsay rule or the general principles discussed [earlier in the opinion]." (Citation omitted.) [2]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.