394 N.J. Super. 237 - Triffin v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2010
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · State v. Simpson · Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co. · Gennari v. Weichert Co. Realtors · Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system's ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party's claim or defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“noted that it possessed the inherent power to impose sanctions and that such authority stemmed from its status as a constitutional court whose basic jurisdiction and prerogatives are traced from the Court of Kings Bench and the Court of Chancery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[s]eparate and distinct from court rules and statutes, courts possess an inherent power to sanction an individual for committing a fraud on the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.