Sprangers v. Interactive Technologies, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2013
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77 · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Aaron v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Donnay v. Boulware · Golden v. Oahe Enterprises, Inc. · Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“That [it] did not know, and in the exercise of reasonable care could not have known, of the existence of facts by reason of which the liability is alleged to exist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Foley v. Allard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.