Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 NW2D 886 - State v. Halverson

State v. Halverson’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2000
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2000

8 state decisions

50198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Curley v. United States · United States v. Knife · State v. Hoenscheid · State v. Gallegos · State v. Blakey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]his evidence, while it might permit conjecture and speculation as to what was `most likely' to occur, is too tenuous to support a verdict beyond a reasonable doubt that [Halverson] intended to commit an assault in attempting to enter the trailer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “sufficiently compelling or persuasive to support a finding beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant intended to commit an assault in the course of the attempted break-in.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he determination of the sufficiency of the evidence ... `may depend upon the difference between pure speculation and legitimate inference from proven facts.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.