Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 Pa. Super. 277 - Commonwealth v. Gee

394 Pa. Super. 277 - Commonwealth v. Gee’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2013

21 state decisions

120199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Commonwealth v. McClendon · Commonwealth v. Darush · 354 Pa. Super. 87 - Commonwealth v. Thomas · 386 Pa. Super. 254 - Commonwealth v. Semuta

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) petition the court for leave to withdraw stating that after making a conscientious examination of the record and interviewing the defendant, counsel has determined the appeal would be frivolous, (2) file a brief referring to any issues in the record of arguable merit and (3) furnish a copy of the brief to defendant and advise him of his right to retain new counsel or raise any additional points he deems worthy of this Court’s review.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) [to] give[] the reviewing court a basis upon which to decide if the appeal is, in fact, frivolous, and (2) [to] give[ ] indigent defendants as nearly as is practicable that which is guaranteed them under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, the right to counsel (and, in the process, [to] protect[] counsel from ineffectiveness allegations). ■”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.