Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 SO2D 1181 - State v. Walker

State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 436 So. 2d 475 - State v. Kahey (1983), 418 So. 2d 515 - State v. Smith (1982)

36 state decisions

2101981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · 360 So. 2d 500 - State v. Drew · 278 So. 2d 781 - State v. Moore · State v. Abercrombie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Clearly, evidence that defendant and his ex-wife, the person to whom defendant's alleged criminal conduct was directed, had had a poor marital relationship and that defendant had a bad temper was relevant as tending to show the commission of the offense. . . .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Relevant evidence is that tending to show the commission of the offense and the intent, or tending to negative the commission of the offense and the intent. Facts necessary to be known to explain a relevant fact, or which support an inference raised by such fact are admissible."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"This Court has repeatedly held that before evidence of criminal conduct may be admitted it must be determined that: (1) there is clear and convincing evidence of the commission of the other crimes and the defendant's connection therewith (citations omitted); (2) the other crimes evidence is substantially relevant for some other purpose than to show a probability that the defendant committed the crime on trial because he is a man of criminal character, (citations omitted); (3) the other crimes evidence does tend to prove a material fact genuinely at issue, (citations omitted); and (4) the probative value of the extraneous crimes evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect, (citations omitted). State v. Walker, supra at 1184 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.