Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 So. 2d 121 - Harmon v. State

394 So. 2d 121 - Harmon v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2007

13 state decisions

60198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Michelson v. United States · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · Pope v. State · Jordan v. State · Dicks v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Arrest, without more, does not, in law any more than in reason, impeach the integrity of a witness.' Harmon v. State, 394 So.2d 121, 125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “All witnesses are subject to cross-examination for the purpose of discrediting them by showing bias, prejudice or interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.