Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 So. 2d 372 - Thomas v. Thomas

394 So. 2d 372 - Thomas v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2014

6 state decisions

401980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Frazier v. Frazier · 52 Ala. App. 10 - Chancellor v. Chancellor · 55 Ala. App. 697 - Meyers v. Meyers · Kyle v. Board of Dental Examiners · 355 So. 2d 382 - Elsevier v. Elsevier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[T]he judge may not take into consideration any property acquired prior to the marriage of the parties or by inheritance or gift unless the trial judge finds from the evidence that such property, or income produced by such property, has been used regularly for the common benefit of the parties during their marriage."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.