Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 SO2D 500 - Cuciak v. State

Cuciak v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Harrington v. California · New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I. IS A DEFENDANT IN A VIOLATION OF PROBATION PROCEEDING ENTITLED TO FULL DISCOVERY UNDER THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE? II. IF DISCOVERY IS AVAILABLE IN A VIOLATION OF PROBATION PROCEEDING, IS A RICHARDSON INQUIRY REQUIRED AS TO NONCOMPLIANCE?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 410 So. 2d 916 - Cuciak v. State
  2. “If a probationer needs additional information in order to properly prepare a defense to the charges, the various methods of discovery under our rules are available to him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 410 So. 2d 916 - Cuciak v. State
  3. “[l]ong ago we recognized ... that trial by ambush is so unfair as to be violative of due process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 410 So. 2d 916 - Cuciak v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.