Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 SO2D 915 - Inman v. Goodson

Inman v. Goodson’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2006

2 state decisions

10198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McGuire v. Van Pelt · Rhodes v. Schofield · Jaffrey & Co. v. McGough · Williams v. Kilpatrick · DeGraffenried v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a spouse does not have to sign a conveyance of property by the other spouse which is in excess of and which reserves unto them an amount of property with a value equal to or greater than that required to constitute [a] homestead.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “No mortgage, deed or other conveyance of the homestead by a married person shall be valid without the voluntary signature and assent of the husband or wife, which must be shown by his or her examination before an officer authorized by law to take acknowledgment of deeds, and the certificate of such officer upon, or attached to, such mortgage, deed or other conveyance, which certificate must be substantially in form of acknowledgment for individuals prescribed by Section 35-4-20. (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When the owner of a homestead which is greater in value than $2,000, or in area than 160 acres, sells a portion thereof, leaving, including the dwelling and land contiguous thereto, the maximum value or area allowed by law for the homestead, this amounts to the selection of a homestead to the exclusion of the alienated tract, and the provisions of the Code (section 4161 [1907 Code, later § 6-10-3 , Code 1975]) with respect to the alienation of homesteads have no application.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.