Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 S.W.3d 382 - Porter v. Commonwealth

Porter v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Johnson v. Zerbst · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Santobello v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no general constitutional right to discovery”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[S]uppression of evidence amounts to a constitutional violation only if it deprives the defendant of a fair trial ... An interpretation of Brady to create a broad, constitutionally required right of discovery would entirely alter the character and balance of our present systems of criminal justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.