Commonwealth v. Pridham’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
August 2023
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Boykin v. Alabama · North Carolina v. Alford · Hill v. Lockhart · Brady v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We note that whether Padilla applies retroactively to cases already final before it was decided is a viable question, but a question not presently before us and one not herein addressed. See United States v. Orocio, 645 F.3d 630 (3rd Cir.2011) (applies retroactively); United, States v. Hong, 671 F.3d 1147 (10th Cir.2011) (does not apply retroactively); Leonard v. Commonwealth, 279 S.W.3d 151 (Ky.2009) (adopting federal courts’ retroactivity analysis). The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Chaidez v. United States, 655 F.3d 684 (7th Cir.2011), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2101 , 182 L.Ed.2d 867 (2012) and presumably will decide this issue this term.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“cot is a rehabilitative measure the General Assembly has deemed important enough to make mandatory. As then-judge, now Justice, Schroder observed for the Court of Appeals in Garland v. Commonwealth, 997 S.W.2d 487 (Ky.App.1999), the fact that sex , offender treatment has been made a condition precedent, to parole does not affect a defendant’s .underlying sentence ánd does not enhance his punishment, even where the effect of the condition precedent is to delay, his- parole eligibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“is a detriment that applies automatically upon conviction of one of the statutory offenses, and while parole, technically, is not within the sentencing court's authority, the parole consequence here is legally inseparable from the conviction and sentence over which the trial court does preside.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.