Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 U.S. 310 - Giordano v. United States

Giordano v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

752
cited by 752 later decisions
9
cited 9 times by the Supreme Court
18
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

540 federal appellate · 45 district · 53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 752 later decisions (9 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2010 · most notably Gelbard v. United States (1972), United States v. Oates (1977)

540 federal appellate · 45 district · 53 state decisions — followed in 18 states

5410196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Alderman v. United States · Desist v. United States · Taglianetti v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 752 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Nothing in Aldermen v. United States, Ivanovov v. United States, or Butenko v. United States, 394 U.S. 165 , 89 S.Ct. 961, 22 L.Ed.2d 176, requires an adversary proceeding and full disclosure for resolution of every issue raised by an electronic surveillance.' Taglianetti v. United States, 394 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 1099, 22 L.Ed.2d 302 (1961).”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “* * * for further proceedings in conformity with Alderman v. United States * * *.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.