Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 U.S. 324 - Orozco v. Texas

Orozco v. Texas’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

1,351
cited by 1,351 later decisions
54
cited 54 times by the Supreme Court
44
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

370 federal appellate · 93 district · 669 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,351 later decisions (54 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably Chimel v. California (1969), Berkemer v. McCarty (1984)

370 federal appellate · 93 district · 669 state decisions — followed in 44 states

52401969197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Mathis v. United States · Orozco v. State

Cited together with Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Oregon v. Mathiason · Mathis v. United States · Beckwith v. United States · Berkemer v. McCarty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,351 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.”
    22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the use of these admissions obtained in the absence of the required warnings was a flat violation of the Self Incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment as construed in Miranda.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “incommunicado interrogation of individuals in a police-dominated atmosphere resulting in self-incriminating statements without full warnings of constitutional rights.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.