Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 394 U.S. 731 - Frazier v. Cupp

Frazier v. Cupp’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

2,802
cited by 2,802 later decisions
63
cited 63 times by the Supreme Court
48
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

850 federal appellate · 105 district · 1,350 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,802 later decisions (63 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1973), Coolidge v. New Hampshire (1971)

850 federal appellate · 105 district · 1,350 state decisions — followed in 48 states

93101969197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedGladden v. Frazier (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Bruton v. United States · Escobedo v. Illinois · Pointer v. Texas · Johnson v. State of New Jersey

Cited together with Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Matlock · Katz v. United States · Bruton v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,802 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “insufficient [by itself] to make [an] otherwise voluntary confession inadmissible,”
    26 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it is hard for us to imagine that the minds of the jurors would be so influenced by such incidental statements during this long trial that they would not appraise the evidence objectively and dispassionately.”
    24 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Since Rawls was a joint user of the bag, he clearly had authority to consent to its search.””
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.