Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 395 F.2d 197 - Steimer v. Gardner

Steimer v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

395 F.2d 197 · 1968

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
May 1997
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently May 1997 · most notably James Hess, Jr. v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of America (1974), Domozik v. Cohen (1969)

25 federal appellate · 4 district ·

3001968197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dean v. Gardner · Alden B. Ryan v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States of America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Only one of the items cited by appellant as examples of the Secretary’s misleading statements appears in the record. That document is the ‘Notice of Hearing.’ It does state that a lawyer is not required, but that representation is permitted, applicant being responsible for the lawyer’s fee. Moreover, the same notice provides extensive information as to the requirements for disability benefits, and informs appellant of the date as of which she had to prove disability. In addition, the hearing examiner more than once indicated to appellant that more information, especially from Dr. Whiting, would be helpful in properly assessing her claim of disability. We conclude that the record does not establish that appellant was misled as to her right to be represented by counsel, and that she received a full and fair hearing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of [a] medically determinable physical or mental impairment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.