Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 395 F.2d 341 - Edgar C. Worts v. A. L. Dutton, Warden, Georgia State Prison

Edgar C. Worts v. A. L. Dutton, Warden, Georgia State Prison’s Empirical Analysis

395 F.2d 341 · 1968

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
6
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably State v. Ortiz (1982), West v. Louisiana (1973)

50 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

570196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Douglas v. People of State of California · Swenson v. Bosler · Williams v. Beto · Pate v. Holman · Wainwright v. Simpson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The only fair inference from the facts of record is that appointed trial counsel advised appellant that he would appeal the case provided he was paid a fee and that appellant could not pay. The lawyer later discussed the matter with appellant’s mother after appellant had requested his mother to talk with the lawyer. He again offered to appeal upon payment of a fee but advised the mother that the court would appoint a lawyer to represent appellant on appeal. There is no evidence whatever of any involvement by the court or any state official in the negotiations concerning the appeal or that the court or any official knew of appellant’s desire to appeal.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the state has no affirmative duty to appoint counsel unless some responsible state official has knowledge that the defendant is indigent, and that he wishes to appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.