Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 395 F.2d 533 - Gray v. Johnson

Gray v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

395 F.2d 533 · 1968

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
February 2000
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2000 · most notably Bollow v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (1981), United States Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo Inc (1992)

13 federal appellate · 6 district ·

12019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Federal Crop Ins Corporation v. Merrill · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · West Virginia ex rel. Sublett v. Adams · Boesche v. Udall · Seaton v. Texas Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ctions by the local agency contrary to the regulations and contrary to the best interest of the Indian do not create a vested interest in the lease. Agents of the government must act within the bounds of their authority; and one who deals with them assumes the risk that they are so acting.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In the circumstances, the execution of the lease was an administrative error which the Secretary can correct by cancellation of the lease, (citations omitted) We believe that the action of the Secretary was proper. 395 F.2d at 537 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.