Bursten v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
395 F.2d 976 · 1968
Citation profile
126 federal appellate · 1 district · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 155 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably State v. Wade (1978), United States v. Conforte (1980)
126 federal appellate · 1 district · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 267 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201
Relies on United States v. Habig · Perez v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Strauss v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 155 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'It is well known, as a matter of judicial notice, that juries are highly sensitive to every utterance by the trial judge, * * * and that some comments may be so highly prejudicial that even a strong admonition by the judge to the jury * * * will not cure the error.'”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“• “If [defense counsel] doesn’t prove it, I hope the jury will hold it against him, because he shouldn’t make that statement unless he has some proof.” • “[Defense counsel], now get back to your own case, if you have a case.” • “[Defense counsel], sit down and let the other attorney take over if you don’t know how to .cross examine this man.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Willoughby v. State“If you find that the defendant had discussed this matter with competent tax counsel and that the tax return herein was prepared pursuant to that advice, then you must find that the defendant did not willfully file a false return or make a false statement, and you should bring in a verdict of not guilty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.