Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 395 F.3d 338 - Kalamazoo Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. Westfield Insurance

Kalamazoo Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. Westfield Insurance’s Empirical Analysis

395 F.3d 338 · 2005

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Morrison v. Board of Trustees (2009), Leonard v. Robinson (2007)

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

210200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Perez v. Aetna Life Insurance · Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance · Cockrel v. Shelby County School District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and judgment is proper as a matter of law.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The district court, and this court in its review of the district court, must view the facts and any reasonable inferences drawn from them in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “because it presents a substantive legal challenge to [this] court's reasoning,” whereas “the province, of Rule 60” is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.