Argaw v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
395 F.3d 521 · 2005
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1497 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 21 U.S.C. § 811 (§ 201 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Samad · Yousefi v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service · 152 Ohio App. 3d 311 - State v. Samatar · Felix Sutherland v. Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States · United States v. Hofstatter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no court shall have jurisdiction to review any final order of removal against an alien who is removable by reason of having committed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“illicit trafficking in a controlled substance,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.