¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
¶3Sim Chestnut appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 IT.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chestnut v. Broum, No. 9:09-cv-01418-RBH, 2010 WL 2136610 (D.S.C. May 25, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶4AFFIRMED.