Kerby v. Commodity Resources Incorporated’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
22 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 1993 · most notably 562 F. Supp. 1180 - Rose v. Arkansas Valley Environmental & Utility Authority (1983), Gilbert v. Bagley (1980)
22 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · Hagans v. Lavine · Rosado v. Wyman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While it will, of course, be required that plaintiffs prove a sufficient connection with interstate commerce or use of the mails to establish jurisdiction at trial, under familiar principles of notice pleading it is not required that the complaint be specific in this regard. That view is expressed as dictum at Page 378 of the opinion of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Stevens v. Vowell, 343 F.2d 374 (10th Cir.1965).” Id. 395 F.Supp. at 789 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ayers v. Speer“litigation brought under federal securities laws in the federal court should be limited to the claims for relief provided under those laws and that state claims should remain in the state courts in the absence of a showing of unfairness to the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.