Walzer v. Osborne’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4 district · 132 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 136 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Breslin v. Powell (2011), Stoddard v. State (2006)
4 district · 132 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tucker v. Fireman's Fund Insurance · Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle Administration · Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A. · Attorney General v. Johnson · Mayor of Baltimore v. Chase
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'failure to file a proper certificate is tantamount to not having filed a certificate at all.'”
25 later decisions quote this exact passage““[A] claim or action filed after July 1, 1986, shall be dismissed, without prejudice, if the claimant or plaintiff fails to file a certificate of a qualified expert with the Director attesting to departure from standards of care, and that the departure from standards of care is the proximate cause of the alleged injury. ” (Emphasis added.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[ll he Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.” U.S. Const amend. XI. 2 . The ADEA provides for concurrent federal and state jurisdiction to hear complaints arising under the statute. 29 U.S.C. § 626 (c). Zimmer-Rubert filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County- 3 . In its petition for certiorari, the Board presented to us the following questions: i. Whether the State of Maryland, pursuant to Section 4-105 of the Education Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, and Section 5-518(c) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, enacted a valid waiver of Eleventh Amendment immunity. ii. Whether the Court of Special Appeals erred in finding that Maryland comity boards of education may not assert Eleventh Amendment immunity as an affirmative defense to "any claim”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.