Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 395 Mont. 1 - Davidson v. Barstad

Davidson v. Barstad’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Norwood v. Service Distributing, Inc. · Ereth v. Cascade County · Beckenheimer's Inc. v. Alameda Associates Ltd. Partnership · Hein v. Fox · Dick Anderson Construction, Inc. v. Monroe Property Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A contract condition is the subsequent occurrence of a specific uncertain act, event, or circumstance.... A condition precedent to contract formation is a specific condition, usually an extraneous event or circumstance or third-party act, the occurrence upon which the reciprocal promises constituting the contract consideration depend.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The failure or non-satisfaction of a condition precedent to contract formation renders the contemplated contract non-existent as never formed and thus non-binding and unenforceable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “defeats the essential purpose of the contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.