395 N.J. Super. 337 - State v. Spell’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Locurto · State v. MacUk · State v. Knight · State v. Widmaier · State v. Dyal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I previously informed you that the warnings given to you concerning your right to remain silent and your right to consult with an attorney, do not apply to the taking of breath samples and do not give you a right to refuse to give, or to delay giving, samples of your breath for the purpose of making chemical tests to determine the content of alcohol in your blood. Your prior response, silence, or lack of response, is unacceptable. If you do not agree, unconditionally, to provide breath samples now, then you will be issued a separate summons charging you with refusing to submit to the taking of samples of your breath for the purpose of making chemical tests to determine the content of alcohol in your blood. Once again, I ask you, will you submit to giving samples of your breath? [New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission Standard Statement for Operators of a Motor Vehicle — N.J.S.A 39:4-50.2(e) (rev. & eff., April 26, 2004).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Spell“we have no supervisory authority over courts and no rulemaking power.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.