Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 395 P.2d 814 - Mitchell v. State

Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2024

6 state decisions

201964197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roulston v. State · 54 Okla. Crim. 295 - Ellis v. State · McMahan v. State · 60 Okla. Crim. 92 - Reynolds v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where evidence is admitted against the defendant which is competent under any of the recognized exceptions to the general rule, but which tends to prove defendant guilty of another crime than that charged, the instructions must limit and restrict the evidence, and leave the jury liberty to consider it only for the particular purpose for which it is admitted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Although no definite time between time of arraignment and time of trial is fixed by law, ordinarily, felony cases should not be assigned for trial in less than 10 days after plea is entered.” At page 816. See also: Reynolds v. State, 60 Okl.Cr. 92 , 61 P.2d 269 (1936).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““In absence of any instruction covering evidence of other offenses in the case at bar, we are of the opinion such evidence was incompetent, and for the jury to consider them without limitation was error sufficient to cause reversal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.