Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 395 P3D 861 - HART v. WARNER

HART v. WARNER’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp. · Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc. · Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission · Sisney v. Smalley · Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “consistently recognized that the application of prejudgment interest statutes to cases filed before the statute was adopted is constitutional as long as the effective date of the statute predated the acceptance of the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “prejudgment interest is assessed at the statutory rate in effect when a verdict is accepted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.