Hinesley v. Davidson’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 2014
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dallas Compress Co. v. Smith · Pickett v. Doe ex rel. Pope · Bishop v. Johnson · Ward v. Chambless · 338 So. 2d 1243 - Duncan v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Consequently, we are disinclined to divert our path from that laid down by Mr. Justice Bloodworth in his initial interpretation of this cause in Hinesley I. Therefore, the trial court’s order denying the remainderman’s right of redemption is reversed; and this cause is remanded for further proceedings to adjudicate the respective parties’ redemptive rights.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is elusive and, again, we are not called upon to set the outer limits of the objective effect of the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.