MacKlin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 1999
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe · Tillman v. United States · Tillman v. United States · United States v. Foutz · United States v. Marionneaux
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f offenses cannot be joined, they cannot be consolidated; and if they cannot be consolidated, they cannot be joined.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) Joinder of Offenses. Two or more offenses which are triable in the same court may be charged in the same indictment or information in a separate count for each offense, when the offenses, whether felonies or misdemeanors, or both, are based on the same act or transaction or on two or more connected acts or transactions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crossley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.