State v. Toomer’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 117 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 118 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 414 So. 2d 741 - State v. Huizar (1982), 719 So. 2d 610 - State v. Owens (1998)
1 federal appellate · 117 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Jackson · Singer v. United States · 360 So. 2d 500 - State v. Drew
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 118 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“presents nothing for this Court's appellate review”
11 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Haywood · State v. Green“eliminate unwarranted prejudice which could arise from surprise testimony.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams · State v. Martin“"The argument shall be confined to evidence admitted, to the lack of evidence, to conclusions of fact that the state of defendant may draw therefrom, and to the law applicable to the case. "The argument shall not appeal to prejudice. "The state's rebuttal shall be confined to answering the argument of the defendant."”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.