Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 395 So. 2d 170 - Perry v. State

395 So. 2d 170 - Perry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably Ford v. Strickland (1983), Scott v. State (1983)

3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

2201980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Lockett v. Ohio · Moore v. Illinois · Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he mere possibility that an item of undisclosed information might have helped the defense, or might have affected the outcome of the trial, does not establish `materiality' in the constitutional sense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[d]isclosure requirements for the prosecution principally concern those matters not accessible to the defense in the course of reasonably diligent preparation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(a) The court shall grant a new trial if any of the following grounds is established: ..... (3) That new and material evidence, that if introduced at the trial would probably have changed the verdict or finding of the court, and that the defendant could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced upon the trial, has been discovered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.