Neathery v. STATE, ETC.’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc. · Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Company · Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company · 276 So. 2d 286 - Smolinski v. Taulli · 282 So. 2d 483 - Parker v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Before a determination of liability can be made, we must first inquire as to whether any causal relationship exists between the harm to the plaintiff and the defendants' alleged negligent conduct. Thus, if the plaintiff can show that he probably would not have suffered the injury complained of but for the conduct of the defendants, he has carried his burden of proof relative to cause-in-fact." [Citations omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.