¶1Despite her claim that the amount was inadequate, there is no showing that the trial court abused its discretion in fixing the attorney’s fees awarded the appellant-wife. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980); Taplin v. Taplin, 386 So.2d 1199, 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); compare, March v. March, 395 So.2d 200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
¶2Affirmed.