395 So. 2d 65 - Ex Parte Carter’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
59 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 792 So. 2d 392 - Ex Parte Cranman (2000), 39 Cal. 3d 862 - Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority (1985)
59 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Aland v. Graham · Wallace v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MONTGOMERY CTY. · Southall v. Stricos Corporation · Engelhardt v. Jenkins · City of Birmingham v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(5) valid inverse condemnation actions brought against State officials in their representative capacity; and (6) actions for injunction or damages brought against State officials in their representative capacity and individually where it is alleged that they had acted fraudulently, in bad faith, beyond their authority or in a mistaken interpretation of law."”
21 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Raley v. Main · Woodfin v. Bender“Inverse condemnation is defined as the taking of private property for public use without formal condemnation proceedings and without just compensation being paid by a governmental agency or entity which has the right or power of condemnation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]hat the State of Alabama shall never be made a defendant in any court of law or equity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.