Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 395 SW2D 609 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1971
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 113 Tex. Crim. 210 - Watson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When the confession was first offered by the state, the jury was retired and testimony was presented to the court on the question of its admissibility. “In the jury’s absence, detective Victor testified that after he gave appellant the statutory warning, appellant proceeded to make the statement, which was typed by a secretary and signed by him. The officer swore that appellant gave the statement voluntarily. “Appellant testified that he did not give the statement voluntarily and swore that the reason he gave it was because he was told that if he did not do so a narcotic charge would be filed against him. He also stated that officers Middleton and Victor threatened to whip him if he did not give the statement and that they refused to let him call a lawyer. “Both officers Victor and Middleton denied having threatened appellant with a narcotic prosecution, or having in any way threatened him with physical violence. Detective Victor denied that appellant made any request for an attorney and stated that an attorney was not mentioned.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.