State v. Tindle’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Deck v. State · State v. Johnson · State v. Freeman · State v. Clayton · State v. Sutherland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“- If hearsay .testimony is erroneously admitted, the admission does not require reversal unless the defendant was prejudiced as a result. State v. Harrison, 213 S.W.3d 58, 76 (Mo.App.S.D. 2006). “A defendant is not prejudiced by hearsay testimony that is merely cumulative of evidence already before the trial court, especially if that evidence was presented by another witness who was subject to cross-examination,” State v. Atkeson, 255 S.W.3d 8, 11 (Mo.App.S.D. 2008). Indeed,, “prejudice - will not be found from the admission of hearsay testimony where the declarant was also a witness at trial, testified on the same matter, and was subject to crossexamination because the primary defects in hearsay testimony are alleviated.” [State v. Steele, 314 S.W.3d 845, 850 (Mo.App. W.D. 2010) ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.