Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 395 U.S. 213 - Jenkins v. Delaware

Jenkins v. Delaware’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

387
cited by 387 later decisions
30
cited 30 times by the Supreme Court
29
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

118 federal appellate · 15 district · 182 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 387 later decisions (30 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2015 · most notably Michigan v. Tucker (1974), Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation (1993)

118 federal appellate · 15 district · 182 state decisions — followed in 29 states

2060196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Stovall v. Denno · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Linkletter v. Walker · Desist v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 387 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “impetus . . . for the implementation of long overdue reforms.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““But in an effort to extend the protection of Miranda to as many defendants as was consistent with society’s legitimate concern that convictions already validly obtained not be needlessly aborted, we selected the commencement of the trial. Implicit in this choice was the assumption that, with few exceptions, the commission and investigation of a crime would be sufficiently proximate to the commencement of the defendant’s trial that no undue burden would be imposed upon prosecuting authorities by requiring them to find evidentiary substitutes for statements obtained in violation of the constitutional protections afforded by Miranda.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[o]nce the need is established for applying [a] principle prospectively ... `there is a large measure of judicial discretion involved in deciding ... the time from which the new principle is to be deemed controlling.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.